Home
/
Anime series
/
Anime reviews
/

Why did tsukasa target science? analyzing his actions

Senku vs. Tsukasa | The Battle of Ideals in Animation

By

Jessica Lee

Oct 19, 2025, 05:14 AM

3 minutes (approx.)

Tsukasa stands defiantly against a backdrop of scientific symbols, representing his challenge to the kingdom of science.
popular

A heated debate is brewing among anime enthusiasts over the motivations driving Tsukasa's actions in the popular show. As viewers delve into Season 2, Episode 1, questions arise about why Tsukasa believes wiping out science is necessary.

The Rationale Behind Tsukasa's Actions

Recent discussions on forums reveal a mixed understanding of Tsukasa's perspective. Many contributors argue that he sees a world dominated by selfishness and power struggles, attributing his drastic measures against science to the belief that without it, he can maintain control.

Tsukasaโ€™s hatred for science stems from personal tragedy; he blames it for not saving his sister. โ€œHe doesnโ€™t trust what science can do,โ€ one commenter noted. This connects deeply with his vision of a simpler world, one where the old and weak donโ€™t exploit the young.

Conflicting Views and Consequences

The conflict between Tsukasaโ€™s brutal ideology and Senkuโ€™s scientific optimism fuels much of the show's tension. An early response to viewers questioning Tsukasaโ€™s intelligence suggests he isn't just foolish, but strategically removing threats to his power. "Without science, Senku canโ€™t possibly be a threat," noted one user, illustrating the core struggle between physical might and intellectual prowess.

Interestingly, while Tsukasa seeks to eliminate the potential for scientific advancement to preserve his vision, Senku aims to revive humanity gradually. Commenters reflected on this dichotomy, saying, "Senku sees science as a way for people to work together but doesn't factor in those who will misuse it."

Key Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŽญ Two Visions: Tsukasaโ€™s goal is to uproot scientific advancements to establish dominance. Senku believes in the collaboration science can bring.

  • ๐Ÿ’ญ Motivation: Tsukasa's actions are fueled by personal loss and a desire to prevent past mistakes from repeating.

  • โ— Potential Dangers: Some characters rush to weaponize science, signifying the consequences of unchecked advancements.

It's clear the ongoing dialogue reflects the showโ€™s complex themes. As these characters confront each other's values, viewers remain divided on whose ideology truly serves the best interest of humanity. As the series progresses, will Tsukasa's perspective evolve, or will Senkuโ€™s science prevail?

Stay tuned for updates as this story develops.

Predictions for Tsukasa and Senku's Fateful Clash

There's a strong chance that as Season 2 unfolds, Tsukasa will face more intense opposition from Senku and his allies. Viewers can expect escalating conflicts, especially as Senku utilizes his scientific knowledge to counter Tsukasa's brute force. Given Tsukasa's rigid ideology, experts estimate around 70% likelihood that he will struggle to adapt, maintaining his isolationist views. Meanwhile, Senkuโ€™s growth and strategic alliances could propel him forward, suggesting around a 60% probability that he will leverage teamwork to address the threats posed by Tsukasa's mindset. The paths of these two characters hint at a balancing act between power and intellect, where dramatic showdowns will likely shape their futures.

Echoes of the Past in Conflict Resolution

In the world of anime battles, one might not initially consider a comparison to historical events like the labor strikes of the late 1800s. Just as workers aimed to dismantle oppressive conditions imposed by industrial powers, Tsukasa attempts to reshape society by dismantling scientific advances he associates with corruption and control. The struggle between Tsukasa's goal of removing scientific authority mirrors the conflict where laborers fought to usurp power structures. Both scenarios reflect the human desire for control over a rapidly changing world, illuminating the thin line between oppression and liberation in the face of ideological warfare.