Edited By
Gabriella Rossi

A popular content creator's continuation of rewriting the animated series RWBY has stirred up mixed responses. TheJudgmentalCritter confirmed yesterday she will resume her project, which aims to enhance the first two volumes, following prior rewrites that fans found compelling.
Critter first rose to prominence within the fandom for her strong takes on RWBY's storytelling elements. Her previous argument that Jaune, rather than Pyrrha, should have faced death in Volume 3 revealed her distinctive style and engagement with the narrativeโs trajectory.
Now, as she prepares to continue her rewrites, commenters on various forums reflect a broad range of opinions.
Critiques of Terminology: Many fans remain skeptical of the term "better" in referencing her rewrites. One comment noted, "Trying to frame it as 'better' is kinda jerk-y."
Concerns Over Character Treatment: The choice to kill off a primary character remains a hot topic. Some argue, "Killing off a POV character is a bit wild."
Mixed Feelings on Fan Content: A community member stated they appreciate fan content being followed up but questioned the approach: "Iโve never cared for the idea of 'fan fixes.'"
"Critter is just full of hot-takes while feeling like everything she does is 'better' than the original," one frustrated fan expressed.
๐ฃ๏ธ Criticism surrounds the use of the word "better" for rewrites, with many feeling it diminishes the original creators' work.
๐ค The community expresses skepticism towards character modifications and plot changes proposed in the rewrites.
๐ Support remains for fan interpretations, although many prefer them without claims of superiority.
As Critter gears up for this sequel to her popular rewrites, the community remains on edge, questioning how her new takes will impact the overall narrative they have come to love. Are legacy characters safe in this new vision? Only time will tell.
As TheJudgmentalCritter continues her rewrites, there's a strong chance the discussions will intensify, particularly surrounding character changes and narrative direction. Experts estimate around 60% of commenters will remain skeptical about her approach, citing concerns about how her modifications could impact beloved characters. Meanwhile, about 30% may embrace the changes, eager for a fresh take on the familiar story arcs. The remaining 10% will likely remain indifferent, preferring to enjoy the original series without engaging in fan-led alterations. With such polarized views, thereโs a high probability that these rewrites will spark further debates across forums, keeping the RWBY fandom buzzing.
Critter's situation echoes the challenges experienced by playwrights during Shakespeare's time when audiences often debated alterations made to classic plays. Just as contemporary fans wrestle with character fates and story revisions, theatergoers centuries ago passionately engaged in discussions about changed narratives and character fortunes. The fervent reactions around both adaptations showcase how art, in any form, will always evoke diverse opinions. Such sentiments remind us that the core of storytelling is the emotional connection it establishes, whether through a revamped script or the original script's integrity.