By
Chen Wu
Edited By
Yuki Tanaka

A wave of reactions has flooded various forums following the premiere of the first episode of a new murder mystery series. Viewers are split on its premise, expressing confusion over its realism while also enjoying the thrill it offers.
Some fans are questioning the overall logic of this intriguing tale, where the murder appears implausible in reality. One user commented, "It makes no sense IRL but itโs a fun murder mystery cartoon, not a true crime documentary."
Another added, "Dawg, the entire premise makes no dang sense." This sentiment suggests many viewers might overlook logical inconsistencies for the sake of entertainment.
Critics have zeroed in on the show's depiction of its gymnast character, who was said to execute a complex murder during a roller coaster ride. "If she is a gymnast, it makes perfect sense. Shouldn't be too difficult for her," one user remarked. However, this reasoning hasnโt silenced skeptics. "Not every case can be super logical and make perfect sense," another commenter mused.
A heated discussion emerged about a particular scene where the gymnast attempted the murder under the cover of darkness. One fan argued, "Going from daylight to darkness messes with your vision hard," indicating that the showโs setting might contribute to the character's chance of evading detection.
The controversy continues to swirl around the main detective's continuous misadventures, with some questioning the logic of how a character can be drugged in almost every episode without anyone catching on. "Bro, the story is about a detective who gets drugged every episode and no one notices," pointed out one viewer. Yet, others appear to embrace the absurdity, asserting that the mix of realism and fiction keeps them engaged.
Interestingly, one fan humorously questioned, "Why the hell were Gin and Vodka riding a roller coaster together?" Many see this as an indication of puzzling story choices that cater to the showโs unique style.
โพ Viewers express mixed feelings about the realism of the plot, with some suggesting a need to ignore errors for entertainment.
โพ The gymnast character raises eyebrows, prompting discussions on feasibility and logic.
โพ Reactions highlight a divide among fans regarding traditional crime narrative expectations.
As the series progresses, it will be fascinating to see if viewers remain captivated by its unusual twists, or if the outlandish elements will eventually turn them away. The landscape of fansโ reactions continues to evolve, sparking both criticism and curiosity.
As the series unfolds, thereโs a strong chance that the storyline will either lean further into absurdity or try to reel back with more credible twists. Experts estimate around 70% of ongoing shows often adjust pacing and storyline based on audience feedback. If fans continue to voice their concerns, the show might introduce a more realistic plot while maintaining its signature thrill. Conversely, if viewership grows despite the criticism, the creators could double down on the wild elements that have captured attention. The next episodes will likely showcase whether the balance tips towards realism or remains steeped in fantasy.
This scenario parallels the rise of animated comedies in the 90s, particularly when classics like "The Simpsons" blurred the lines between reality and satire, sparking debate among fans on societal issues while keeping humor front and center. Just like todayโs viewers grappling with the gymnastโs antics, audiences then were split over the absurdity of Homer Simpsonโs actions. Such animated shows thrived by pushing boundaries, often leading to cultural critiques. In this case, the ongoing reactions to the murder mystery series may reveal similar dynamics, as entertaining narratives encourage conversations that extend beyond the screen, shaping the way comedy and drama are perceived in popular culture.