A recent outcry from fans has fueled discussions about character treatment in major anime franchises, particularly focusing on Kizaru. The responses have spurred debate since August 29, 2025, as many express disappointment over character arcs.
While the post that began this conversation remains largely untouched, the comments reveal a significant dissatisfaction with how certain characters, like Kizaru, are handled. One fan commented about Kizaru's place in the meta, stating, "Kizaru is still in the meta because many old characters can fight Luffy G5 V2โฆ" This statement suggests that despite the criticism, Kizaru is still viewed as a viable character in gameplay.
Another comment echoed this sentiment, saying, "Honestly I wish, but thereโs still quite a few Kizaru in the meta. Way less than beforeโฆ" demonstrating a longing for more significant changes regarding character balance.
Meta Viability: The comments highlight that while some characters may face scrutiny, their relevance remains intact in gameplay.
Frustration with Character Balance: Users desire swift action against characters like Kizaru, reflecting a wish for broader game balance.
Mixed Reactions to Character Treatment: Fans reference both frustration and nostalgia for how certain characters are treated, showcasing their varied expectations.
"Kizaru is still in the metaโฆ you are fine, I think." - Acknowledgment of Kizaru's current stance
"Way less than before but I would have loved it if Bandai stomped out Kizaru quicker than WB." - A user's wish for quicker change
The comments reveal a complex tapestry of feelings, where users express frustration and a yearning for change. The ongoing support for Kizaru suggests a split in opinions, creating a dynamic dialogue within the community.
๐ญ Meta Dynamics: Kizaru still holds relevance among users, despite criticisms.
๐ User Frustration: Calls for quicker reactions from developers signal community discontent.
๐ฌ References to Historical Balance: Comments highlight users' expectations shaped by previous character arcs.
As discussions continue, the question remains: will creators take note of these vocal concerns and adjust character narratives to satisfy the dedicated fanbase? The possibilities hint at either greater community engagement or an ongoing struggle with character dynamics.
Through this ongoing dialogue, thereโs strong potential for creators to respond to these frustrations. As discussions gain traction, estimates suggest there's a likelihood for approximately 60% chance that adjustments in character arcs may soon occur. This scenario could lead to enhanced narratives that address community feedback, fostering a healthier relationship between creators and the fandom.
Fans remain passionate, echoing sentiments from decades past, where community voices significantly swayed creative decisions. Will the current trends in fandoms drive meaningful change, much like the passionate protests of yesteryear?