Home
/
Anime series
/
Anime reviews
/

Patlabor 2: why the attack helicopter shouldn't fly

Patlabor 2 Helicopter Controversy | Fans Debate Flight Feasibility

By

David Smith

Jul 21, 2025, 07:48 PM

Edited By

Ravi Patel

Updated

Jul 22, 2025, 08:49 AM

2 minutes (approx.)

A detailed view of the attack helicopter showing its unique design without a tail rotor or coaxial rotor, highlighting its aerodynamics issues.
popular

Engaging the Community

Fans are increasingly vocal about the attack helicopter in Patlabor 2, questioning its ability to fly. As conversations heat up, contributions across multiple forums reflect varying opinions, indicating a split in community sentiment.

Technical Insights and Critiques

Several comments highlight details that spark further interest among viewers. One fan noted,

"If youโ€™re going to nitpick a detail about helicopters, check alternative tail configurations on Google first."

This stresses the importance of understanding existing technology like NOTAR, which has been in use commercially since the 1970s.

Interestingly, another commenter added,

"For some reason, they look boss as [expletive], thatโ€™s why. Less rotors are also easier to animate."

This speaks to the artistic decisions behind the helicopterโ€™s design, showcasing a blend of practicality and aesthetics.

Diverse Community Reactions

Commenters express a mixture of skepticism and admiration. One fan simply stated,

"But it does though," signaling support for the helicopter's fictional capabilities.

Additionally, a lighthearted remark noted,

"Itโ€™s an anime, itโ€™s designed to look cool, not to fly in real life."

This echoes a sentiment that emphasizes the animated nature of the series, reinforcing its fantasy aspect.

Key Themes Emerging from Discussions

  • Technical Realism: The acknowledgment of existing technologies like NOTAR has ignited conversations around aviation advancements.

  • Artistic License: Many fans appreciate the visual appeal of the helicopter, viewing its design through an animation-focused lens.

  • Engaging Humor: Humor weaves through discussions, making them enjoyable without losing the analytical edge.

Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŒŸ NOTAR technology: A reality since the '70s, adding credibility to the design discussions.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Community sentiment is mixed, with some embracing the artistic angle while others advocate for more technical accuracy.

  • ๐ŸŽจ Animated appeal outweighs some critiques of realism, leading to creative fan expressions like art and cosplay.

What's Next?

As discussions continue, a surge of fan art and cosplay is expected. The community's engagement could lead to deeper exploration of both anime's potential and real-world aviation advancements.

Fans are likely to push the boundaries, collaborating in ways that blend the imaginative aspects of anime with the realities of technology. Can aviation experts and anime creators find common ground? Only time will tell.