Edited By
Nicolette Rivers
Recent discussion among fans reveals a heated debate surrounding player bids in the ongoing NEL. Despite Nagi's performance, many believe he's been undervalued, especially compared to lesser-performing peers. The situation has stirred controversy in the fandom, highlighting discrepancies in the bidding process.
Fans have noted that Nagi scored a significant goal, arguably the best in the series, yet saw his value drop dramatically.
Nagi was valued at 88 million yen but fell to 24 million yen after others misjudged him.
In contrast, a character named Toki, who performed poorly, only dropped 1 million yen.
One commenter stated, "16 million was an artist error. Darai has a bid of 15 mil in chapter 204." Others echoed similar sentiments about confusing bid changes across rounds.
While Nagi's case drew attention, some fans argue that Miroku Darai was unfairly treated. Darai, previously a key player during the U20 arc, saw his value fluctuate significantly without a clear reason.
First Round: Did not play, understandable with stronger players starting.
Second Round: Played and received a 16 million yen bid.
Third Round: Despite not playing, his bid dropped to 15 million yen.
Fourth Round: Bench time resulted in no bid changes.
Final Game: Contributed yet saw no increase while others did.
"Darai got robbed, man," lamented a fan, underscoring a growing frustration with the bidding system.
Fans expressed a mix of confusion and anger toward the bidding inconsistencies:
"People love an underdog!" resonated with many, emphasizing a longing for less popular characters to shine.
Yet, queries arose on whether Darai's recent emergence would impact his future value.
Moreover, another fan pointed out the arbitrary nature of bidding, saying, "Niou randomly getting such an increase while being no factor is crazy."
Key Insights:
๐ฝ Bid Drops: Nagi's value decreased 64 million despite key contributions.
๐ญ Character Love: Both Nagi and Darai have strong fan support but face harsh bidding realities.
๐ Fandom Frustration: Many feel the bidding conflicts reflect a disregard for player performances.
Fans continue to scrutinize the bidding, pushing for a system that accurately reflects player potential and contributions in the NEL. What changes will come next?