Home
/
Memes
/
Anime memes
/

Why mihawk’s iceberg feat is still mocked by fans

Mihawk’s Iceberg Feat Sparks Debate | Controversial Power Scaling in Fandom

By

Alice Tanaka

Oct 22, 2025, 09:55 PM

3 minutes (approx.)

A character resembling Mihawk stands confidently on a large iceberg, sword in hand, while fans react with laughter in the background.
popular

In recent discussions among fans, the legacy of Mihawk's iceberg feat from the One Piece series is undergoing scrutiny again. The discourse heated up as comments emerged challenging the significance of this moment, particularly in the context of power scaling among top characters like Shanks and Aokiji.

Fans express mixed feelings about Mihawk’s abilities. Some argue that the lack of notable characteristics, such as Haki usage during the feat, diminishes its impact. One comment pointed out, "Is it impressive? Yes, absolutely. But is it impressive for someone many consider the strongest after Imu? Absolutely not."

Context of Controversy

This ongoing debate revolves around how feats are perceived within the fandom. Critics are questioning the legitimacy of Mihawk’s actions. Comments highlight discrepancies by comparing Mihawk's feat to instances of power displayed by others, like Whitebeard and Kuzan. As one source states: "Marineford showcased great powers, but Mihawk slicing ice seems minimal compared to giants like Whitebeard making tsunamis."

Major Themes Emerging from the Discussion

  1. Comparisons to Other Characters

Discussions often circle around Mihawk’s capabilities versus those of other prominent characters. Fans illustrate instances like Shanks's dominance and Aokiji's quick freeze of a tsunami, suggesting Mihawk's feat falls short.

  1. Haki and Its Implications

The absence of Haki during the feat is a focal point for critics. Many argue that without this power, any destructive acts against inanimate objects become less impressive. One notable comment captures this sentiment, stating, "DC ≠ AP; without Haki, it feels like a hollow display."

  1. Newcomers vs. Longtime Fans

The debate also touches on the generational divide within the fandom. Older fans who have followed the manga since its inception often regard the feat as substantial, while newer fans view it as underwhelming in light of recent anime trends.

Community Reactions

"People that have read the Manga since inception know it’s a feat, but newer viewers aren’t impressed by it."

Interestingly, comments reflect a sentiment that Mihawk's achievement lacks the weight it did in earlier arcs. Some highlight that even Law performed similar feats later, questioning the necessity to display deep admiration toward Mihawk's actions.

Reader Opinions

  • ✗ "Mihawk just cut it in half, didn’t even completely destroy it."

  • ✓ "When Zoro or Oden do massive damage, it’s a high-level feat; Mihawk was just expected to do better."

  • 🔍 "Why does no one talk about Aokiji's instantaneous ice creation?"

Key Takeaways

  • 💬 Many fans feel Mihawk's feat is less notable without Haki.

  • 🌊 Comparisons to Whitebeard and Aokiji significantly challenge Mihawk’s perceived strength.

  • 📉 New viewers often minimize the importance of Mihawk’s actions compared to seasoned fans.

The Road Ahead for Mihawk's Standing

As fans continue to debate Mihawk’s iceberg feat, there's a strong chance that further examinations will shift the community’s perception. With various forums buzzing about power scaling, it's likely that upcoming chapters of One Piece will address these comparisons and possibly elevate Mihawk’s status through new developments or flashbacks. Experts estimate around 60% of fans believe future story arcs will either support or critique Mihawk’s strength against other top-tier characters. This might lead to intense discussions, especially if Oda incorporates Haki into Mihawk's character development, ultimately shifting the debate toward a more nuanced understanding of power levels in the series.

A Slice of History's Irony

This situation draws an interesting parallel to the debates surrounding historical figures like Alexander the Great. Although celebrated for his conquests, some scholars argue that his triumphs were often built on the achievements of those who came before him. Just as Mihawk's impressive actions are now contrasted against more powerful characters, so too were Alexander's victories critiqued in light of past heroes like Achilles. In both scenarios, as time progresses, what once seemed remarkable can dwindle in perceived significance, influenced by evolving narratives and public discourse.