A heated discussion is brewing among fans of Death Note about which character reigns supreme in intelligence. Recent forum comments challenge traditional views on Light Yagami and Lawliet (L), adding depth to an already intense rivalry.
Some fans argue that the claim of Lightโs superiority over L stems from misinterpretations of translated material. A noteworthy comment pointed out that in the Japanese version of Death Note How to Read Volume 13, the terms used differentiate between knowledge and intelligence. The stat for human characters employs the word ็ฅ่ญ (Chishiki), meaning "Knowledge," while Shinigami characters use ็ฅๆง (Chisei), referencing "Intelligence."
The distinction implies that references to Light having more knowledge through the Death Note should not equate to higher intelligence. As one fan put it, "The book says, 'intelligence,' but it simply means information knowledge."
Supporters of L highlight his talent for strategic deduction, contrasting Light's advantage of access to the Death Note. As one commenter stated, "Light had all the advantages but L had unique advantages too that made him smarter."
Fans also noted Lโs historical legacy, suggesting that even without the notebook, his intellect shines through his psychological manipulation and problem-solving skills. In contrast, Lightโs advantages rely heavily on his supernatural tool.
"So L's real name was actually L and Light still couldn't kill him. That right there shows you that L is smarter than Light."
Interestingly, much debate surrounds Near's character as well. Some assert that although Near may be portrayed as similar in intelligence to L, he fails to surpass him. One fan noted that Near has grown from Lโs methods but still can't fully mirror his cunning and resourcefulness.
Terminology Discrepancies: Clarifications on translations can lead to differing interpretations of intelligence.
Function of Intelligence: Supporters suggest that intelligence isn't solely about information but strategic thinking.
Near's Perceived Intelligence: Ongoing debates compare Near, L, and Light, questioning claims of superiority among them.
The sentiment among fans remains divided:
Some still defend Light, arguing, "He knows the rules, how to use the Death Note L only knows a fraction of that."
Others firmly believe Lโs mastery of strategic deduction outweighs Lightโs informational edge.
๐ฅ Critics argue mistranslations may inflate Light's perceived intellect.
๐ Lโs strategic thinking portrayed as a significant differentiator from Lightโs advantage.
๐ Near's intelligence remains debated, adding complexity to assessments of these iconic characters.
As discussions continue to unfold in fan communities, fresh perspectives are likely to arise, further enriching this enduring debate. With many fans pushing back against light-centric narratives, can the tide turn in favor of L? And how will these interpretations shape fan theories moving forward?