Edited By
Jasmine Lee
A heated debate has erupted within the fandom regarding Hyo's strength as a character in the ongoing series. Many fans are calling Hyo a coward while others defend him, pointing to his moral compass. The discussion took off post-release as comments flooded in, creating a divide.
The controversy began with a post criticizing Hyo as "a weak coward" who targets easier opponents to boost his profile. Critics argue his actions reveal a lack of courage, especially during the prisoner arc against Saw, who was already worn out from previous battles. Supporters highlight Hyo's reluctance to harm innocents and quote his own admission of being unfit for an assassin's role.
Critics accuse Hyo of cowardice, citing his choice to fight Saw, a weakened opponent, instead of stronger characters.
Supporters argue Hyo's compassion for civilians contributes to his combat choices, showing depth to his character.
Commenters are torn; while some see him as inferior, others firmly believe he is not a coward.
"For clarification, Hyo knew he wasnโt cut out to be an assassin"
Positive Sentiment: "Was he weak? Weak er than the rest of the order, yes. Was he a coward? FAR FROM IT! ๐"
Negative Sentiment: "Itโs time for yโall to wake up and realize Hyo is just all bark and no bite."
This debate has drawn a mix of sentiments. Some fans support Hyoโs character on moral grounds, while others lambast him for supposed cowardice. A commenter noted, "Everybody knows if youโre trying to take out a group, you go for the weakest link."
โ๏ธ Many fans believe Hyo intentionally avoided combat with stronger fighters.
๐ฌ Some argue his choices reflect a moral stance rather than cowardice.
๐จ Discussions are split, with strong opinions on both sides.
This ongoing dialogue showcases the complexities of character interpretation and fandom passion as they navigate the latest story developments.