Edited By
Elena Rossi

In a heated discussion within the anime and manga community, questions swirl around the character Garp from One Piece. Fans are debating his complex relationship with the World Government, questioning whether he has truly overcome the allegations of complicity in their violent actions.
Garp's actions and his continued service in the Marines have ignited strong opinions. Many believe he should have acted against heinous acts, particularly those targeting innocent civilians. Fans express these sentiments across various platforms, showcasing a divide among supporters and critics.
Inaction Equals Complicity: Many fans argue that Garp's failure to oppose the Marines' brutalities, such as the slaughter of pregnant women and children, tarnishes his reputation. A commenter noted, "Inaction is complicity, especially from someone as strong as Garp."
Frustration at Loyalty to the Government: Garp's allegiance to the World Government raises significant questions about his moral standing. Critics argue that his choice to remain part of an unjust system undermines any claims of heroism. "Why does he continue to serve the WG? If he wanted to, he would have protested when the Marines slaughtered innocents," said a fan, underscoring doubts about his integrity.
Potential for Redemption or Regret: Supporters still cling to hope that Garp will eventually join the revolution led by his son, Dragon. However, thereโs a prevailing sentiment that his past choices make this less credible. One user stated, "If I was Garp, I would have joined Dragon right away."
"What did he do to stop it all? Just a brute who attacked Imu because it looked powerful."
"Actions >> words. Garp's inaction stains him more than his supporters understand."
While many voices call for a reassessment of Garp's character, others dismiss the allegations as mere fan fiction. The sentiment among fans is mixed, with ongoing discussions echoing both outrage and defensive support for Garp's narrative arc.
๐ "Garp has not beaten the allegations," a fan claims, suggesting ongoing criticism.
๐ฅ Many argue his loyalty stains his heroic image despite his strength.
โ๏ธ "If he wanted to oppose, he surely could have", highlighting frustration with his inaction.
As the debate intensifies, the questions surrounding Garp's true nature and actions promise to keep the fandom engaged. Will he rise as a hero or remain a symbol of complicity?
As discussions unfold, thereโs a strong chance Garp could face more scrutiny in upcoming plot developments. Fans speculate he may either wrestle with the consequences of his inaction or finally make a decisive moral stance. If Garp were to shift allegiance and stand against the World Government, it would likely require dramatic narrative twists, estimated at about 70% likelihood, due to the seriesโ focus on redemption arcs. Alternatively, should he maintain the status quo, 30% of the fandom might view him as a fixed symbol of conflict within the Marines, allowing for intense debates to persist among the community.
Analogies can be drawn to the fallout of the Watergate scandal in the early 1970s, where loyalty to a flawed system led many to question the integrity of individuals who chose silence over dissent. Just as some Americans felt torn between political allegiance and moral conviction, fans now grapple with Garpโs dualityโthe superhuman strength overshadowed by moral ambiguity. This historic instance illustrates how leaders or figures of power can create a ripple effect, significantly impacting those around them and shaping public opinion for years to come.