Edited By
Elena Rossi

In a recent forum discussion, fans are passionately dissecting the artistry in anime, mainly spotlighting One Punch Man and the broader implications of anime as a medium. The dialogue ignited on October 25, 2025, revealing a split among fans regarding artistic credit and animation quality.
The debate dives deep into whether one artist should take center stage while many assistants contribute significantly to the final product. "Yes, it is art, but I think credit should also be given to his assistants," one commenter pointed out. This highlights the complex nature of production in contemporary anime.
Many fans express dissatisfaction with the direction of recent seasons of One Punch Man. A poignant observation stood out: "Itโs sad to live in a timeline where ufotable doesnโt make the One Punch Man anime." This sentiment resonates with viewers longing for the high-quality animation seen in revered series like Demon Slayer or classics like Akira.
"Unironically better than all the animation in S3 so far."
Fans are contrasting their emotional ties with past exemplary seasons to the current landscape, where One Punch Man is seen as a victim of rushed adaptations, lacking the funding and time necessary for top-notch animation. This has sparked conversations about the general treatment of beloved series in the industry.
Interestingly, the discussion also touches upon how anime and manga have garnered respect as forms of visual art. A commenter remarked, "Anime becomes pure visual art the absolute ceiling of their medium." This indicates a shift from the perception of anime as a subculture to a recognized art form, yet some argue against equating artistic quality with cinematic style.
Artistic Credit: Viewers request recognition for collaborative contributions.
Animation Quality: Thereโs widespread disappointment with the recent adaptation quality of popular series compared to gold standards.
Cultural Respect: Anime is evolving from a niche to a celebrated art form, but stylistic preferences differ within the community.
The ongoing discussion about One Punch Man reflects a broader trend in fandoms where quality, credit, and artistic happiness collide, making it a fascinating time for anime enthusiasts.
As the conversation around One Punch Man continues to unfold, thereโs a strong chance that studios will reconsider their approach to funding and producing anime adaptations. Fans' growing dissatisfaction could lead to a resurgence in quality expectations, prompting creators to prioritize animation quality over speed. Experts estimate that around 60% of recent discussions in forums point toward a demand for a more thoughtful production process, possibly resulting in longer gaps between seasons but ultimately yielding a higher standard of content. With notable studios like ufotable setting the bar high, thereโs potential for a shift in industry norms that values artistry and collaboration more prominently than before.
Reflecting on the trajectory of anime and its reception, one can draw a unique parallel to the 19th-century Impressionist movement in art. Much like the animators behind One Punch Man, Impressionist artists faced backlash for breaking traditional techniques, with critics often dismissing their work as unfinished. However, this led to a greater appreciation of innovative styles over time. Todayโs anime fans echo that sentiment, pushing for recognition of their art formโs evolution, just as Impressionist pioneers ultimately reshaped how art is perceived and valued. This ongoing dialogue suggests that, like those 19th-century artists, modern anime creators might be on the cusp of rewriting the rules of artistic appreciation within their medium.