Home
/
Anime series
/
Anime reviews
/

Shouldn't eren target weapons not civilians?

Why Attack Fleets and Weapons When Civilians Are Safe? | A Look into Paradis Conflict

By

Alice Tanaka

Feb 24, 2026, 12:32 PM

Edited By

Yuki Sato

2 minutes (approx.)

Eren stands at a crossroads, contemplating the choice between attacking military targets or civilians, with a backdrop of destruction around him.

A recent discussion has sparked intense debate among fans about the controversial methods of defense and attack employed by the people of Paradis. Many are questioning why the strategy didn't focus on eliminating threats while protecting innocent civilians in the wake of escalated tensions with Marley and the broader world.

Context of Paradis' Dilemma

As tensions rose, the world prepared to attack Paradis, leading to a complex situation. Attacks were escalated without clear communication or attempts at peace, igniting debates about the actions of key figures, particularly Eren Yeager. Many fans express frustration over his lack of diplomatic efforts.

"Eren sabotaged peace efforts to achieve his personal goal of annihilating the world outside the island," one comment highlights.

Mixed Strategies and Poor Intelligence

Numerous commentators pointed out several barriers to executing a more strategic approach:

  • Lack of Intelligence: Paradis residents lacked detailed knowledge about military bases worldwide, making it challenging to target threats without collateral damage.

  • Risk of Miscalculation: Any offensive would likely result in destruction, affecting innocents, similar to existing military strategies that led to high casualties.

Eren's Reluctance for Peace

The overarching sentiment suggests Eren's choices stem from deeper personal motivations:

  • Freedom through Annihilation: Some argue that Eren's vision included an empty world to reshape according to his childhood ideals. "To him, freedom meant an empty world where his dreams could exist," noted a commenter, highlighting Eren's disturbing quest for an idealized freedom.

  • Rejection of Peace Attempts: As multiple factions devised strategies to end hostilities, Eren's decision to attack undermined opportunities for dialogue.

The Consequences of Choices

The aftermath of Paradis' decisions illustrates a complex narrative filled with conflicts, betrayals, and tragic outcomes. Eren's actions raise pivotal questions about the cost of peace and the definition of freedom in a world torn apart by war.

Key Takeaways

  • Threats and Secrecy: Paradis had limited intel on international military bases.

  • Erenโ€™s Agenda: His actions reflect a deeper desire for destruction over diplomacy.

  • Future Outlook: A cycle of violence may perpetuate unless new strategies emerge.

The ongoing conversations invite fans to examine whether a different path would have led to a more favorable outcome, prompting the question: Can peace be achieved in a world deep into conflict?

What Lies Ahead for Paradis?

Looking ahead, thereโ€™s a strong chance that the conflict surrounding Paradis will intensify. As the situation stands, many are predicting a rise in global tensions with further military escalations likely. Experts estimate around 70% probability that without diplomatic dialogues, Paradis may face catastrophic retaliation, leading to a cycle of violence that could last for years. A shift in strategies, particularly focusing on peace rather than destruction, could alter this trajectory, but such a change hinges on the willingness of key players like Eren to consider alternatives to combat.

History's Echo in Paradise's Struggle

In an interesting twist, the current struggle in Paradis mirrors the tensions seen during the Cuban Missile Crisis, where one misstep could have led to dire consequences across the globe. Just as international players misjudged intentions and escalated conflicts, Erenโ€™s choices may also be propelled by personal ideologies rather than clarity of the broader implications. In both instances, the shadow of war looms, driven by fear, personal agendas, and a lack of effective communication. History teaches that isolation and fear can birth conflict, making it crucial for those in power to explore paths of dialogue before the situation spirals beyond control.