Edited By
Ravi Patel

In a heated discussion online, fans are criticizing the narrative choices in the recent chapter of a popular series, with many feeling the writing is subpar. A forum user, self-styled as Agenda Man, led the charge, stating the new abilities and character developments detract from the overall story.
Commenters have pointed out several aspects of the writing that they find lacking. One user lamented, "Oda is pretty ass. He couldn't find a good motivation for Roger to go to God Valley" This sentiment echoes a broader frustration regarding character motivations and plot coherence.
Weak Character Development
Many fans feel that developments around character Rocks lack depth. One user commented that "it's a bullshit ass ability with no limits" indicating dissatisfaction with how powers are portrayed. This weakens the stakes during conflicts.
Inconsistent Plot Arcs
Critics highlighted how the supposed rivalry between Roger and Rocks is poorly executed. A commentator reflected, "Why should I care about Rocks and Roger and Garp being hyped as the big 3 when all three seem to like one another?" This raises questions about the tension expected in their battles.
Forced Writing Choices
Another prevalent concern was the introduction of Shakky and its perceived unnatural fit within the narrative. A user noted the "weird[] glorification of Shakky in this plotline, asserting that many story elements feel heavily contrived.
The collective response appears overwhelmingly negative, highlighting a disconnect between the expected epic storytelling and the current writing choices. One comment accurately sums it up: "It's just a product of lazy writing." Fans are left wondering how these developments will resonate in future chapters.
๐ด A majority of comments criticize character arcs and abilities.
๐ด Users are calling for more clear motivation and engaging plotlines.
๐ฌ "Oda is completely allergic to generating any sort of tension" - represents a common critique.
As discussions evolve, fans remain cautious yet hopeful for future improvements. Will future chapters rectify these narrative missteps, or will the series continue down this contentious path? Only time will tell.
A Unique Reflection from a Past Failure\nIn the late 90s, the animated series "The Starry Sky Chronicles" faced a similar backlash due to inconsistent character portrayals and plot holes. It struggled to maintain viewer interest as it tried to introduce new elements that ultimately fell flat, much like the current situation with Domi Reversi. While that series eventually found its stride by revisiting core storylines, it had to first endure a painful period of critique and declining audiences. This serves as a reminder that even well-loved series occasionally lose their way and must adapt to reclaim their true fans.