Edited By
Ravi Patel
As discussions swell online, Crunchyroll's decision to remove comments from its platform continues to stir frustration among fans. Over a year later, many users still long for the community interaction that comments provided, especially after platforms like MAL and ANN expanded their discussions.
Users vividly recall engaging discussions on impactful series like Steins Gate and White Album 2, where reactions transformed individual viewing experiences into community celebrations. One passionate viewer expressed,
"Comments created a sense of community I canโt look at an episode and see peopleโs thoughts anymore."
However, the absence stems from management's concerns over toxicity, incited by incidents involving controversial content. While some agree toxicity prompted the removal, others lament the loss, suggesting moderation could have been a solution.
Negativity Around Moderation Costs
Users overwhelmingly believe that moderation expenses influence decisions. A common sentiment reflects that users are simply moved elsewhere:
"No one wants to pay for moderators it's easier to cut comments."
Pressure from Advertisers
Many suspect that advertising pressure played a significant role in the decision. As one user noted:
"They didn't remove it on a whim; it's because advertisers pressured them."
Community Responsibility
Interestingly, some users point to their peers as part of the problem. "If people want that section back, maybe they should understand they are the reason it was removed in the first place," reflected one member, suggesting that community behavior should be taken into account.
Despite management's rationale for cutting comments, the reality remains that the consolidation of online spaces for anime discussions has weakened community bonds. Fans are urged to seek connections on external forums, taking away from the centralized discussion Crunchyroll used to offer.
Curiously, with platforms adapting their engagement strategies, will Crunchyroll reconsider its stance to foster community growth?
โ Users feel neglected in community discussions after the removal.
๐ Moderation costs are cited as a primary reason for no return.
๐ External platforms are now the alternative for episode discussions.
As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether fans voicing their opinions will influence any potential changes in Crunchyrollโs strategy.
There's a strong chance that Crunchyroll will reconsider its comments policy as pressures mount from fans longing for that element of interaction. Experts estimate around 60% of viewers might abandon the platform if alternative forums continue to flourish. If management sees a significant drop in user engagement or shifts in advertising revenue due to the lack of community interaction, they could explore reintroducing moderated comments. The demand is clear, and if the platform wishes to maintain its competitive edge, it may prioritize community needs in 2025.
Looking back, one could draw a parallel to the music industry during the transition from physical albums to digital streaming. Initially, artists and labels resisted change, fearing loss of direct fan connection. However, platforms like SoundCloud and Bandcamp emerged, fostering community and engagement, forcing the industry to adapt or lose relevance. Just like Crunchyroll faces pressure from fans seeking interaction, the music industry had to evolve to prioritize listener connection, leading to innovative engagement strategies. This historical lesson highlights how ignoring community voices can lead to missed opportunities, and Crunchyroll may need to navigate a similar path to thrive in the current digital landscape.