Edited By
Priya Gupta
In a wave of backlash, fans of the original Death Note are voicing displeasure over Netflixโs 2017 adaptation. Significant character modifications and altered story dynamics sparked heated debates on forums as viewers reflect on the filmโs shortcomings eight years post-release.
Fans are unanimous in their disappointment regarding pivotal character reshaping and plot alterations. Key points raised include:
Character Integrity: Light Turner replaces Light Yagami, leading many to argue he lacks the depth of the original character. One user states, "That movie was ass" distilling the consensus.
Missing Elements: Prominent characters like Misa and Wattari are absent, marking a notable departure from the source material, which some feel undermines the filmโs authenticity.
Changing the Family Dynamic: Many viewers lament the adjustments made to character relationships, with some suggesting the story would have been better if it introduced a new, separate protagonist.
"You could have just put 'Everything besides Willem Dafoe.'" - A disappointed fan commenting on the casting of Ryuk.
The discussion broaches potential redemption arcs for the adaptation. Some argue that had Turner been depicted as a successor to Yagami, the narrative could have resonated better.
Alternative Premise Ideas:
Post-Original Narrative: Sketch out a story depicting a bored Ryuk mentoring Turner as the next Kira, thus aligning motivations more closely with the original.
Character Evolution: Some viewers believe focusing on Turnerโs desperate desire to help, rather than pure ambition for power, might provide a more relatable angle.
The overall mood in forums has been largely negative. Suggestions for improvement echo throughout the discussion. Fans seem to find little charm in the adaptation when compared to the beloved manga and anime series, shining a dim light on Netflix's creative choices.
๐ฅ Character Changes leave many fans frustrated over Light Turnerโs portrayal.
โ Missing Key Characters like Misa diminish the depth of the storyline.
๐ค Creative Alternatives might have resulted in a more compelling film.
The sentiment surrounding Netflix's Death Note remains predominantly critical. As fans hold tightly to the legacy of the original, it begs the question: Can adaptations truly capture the essence of the beloved tales they seek to retell?
There's a strong chance Netflix will rethink its approach to future adaptations following the backlash from fans of Death Note. Given the current climate around anime and manga adaptations, experts estimate around a 70% likelihood that the streaming giant will prioritize staying true to source materials. With a growing audience clamoring for authentic storytelling, strategies may shift towards incorporating fan feedback to ensure renewed interest in existing franchises. This could lead to the introduction of more faithful adaptations that resonate with both new viewers and long-time fans, potentially restoring faith in Netflix's creative decisions.
An intriguing parallel can be drawn from the world of classic cinema, particularly with Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho. Initially met with skepticism due to its departure from standard horror tropes, the film found success by pushing boundaries. Just as Death Note's adaptation faced criticism for straying too far from beloved characters and storylines, Psycho eventually paved the way for a new genre of psychological thrillers. The lessons from both cases highlight how ambitious reinterpretations can lead to groundbreaking outcomesโeven if met with initial resistance. Sometimes, what appears to be a failure can fundamentally change the landscape, providing new opportunities for future projects.