Home
/
Manga series
/
Manga reviews
/

Controversial manga opinions: junji ito and berserk critique

Controversial Manga Opinions | Junji Ito and Berserk Under Fire

By

Sofia Martinez

Apr 19, 2025, 01:40 AM

Edited By

Tanya Lee

Updated

Apr 19, 2025, 11:47 AM

2 minutes (approx.)

An illustration of a heated debate among manga fans with contrasting views on Junji Ito's work and Berserk, featuring thought bubbles and comic-style backgrounds.

As tensions flare in the manga fandom, bold opinions on popular series like Berserk and Junji Ito's works spark heated discussions across forums. This growing discourse reflects a divide, with several people questioning the acclaimed status of these titles, particularly in light of recent comments.

Discontent with Beloved Titles

The controversy began when one participant expressed a lack of appreciation for Ito's storytelling, stating, "I think Junji Itoโ€™s stories for the most part suck." The sentiment gained traction, as several others chimed in with their own criticisms.

Key Themes Emerging from the Debate

  1. Berserk's Artistic Value Questioned: Some contributors feel Berserk, despite its visual appeal, falls flat in narrative depth.

    • A notable commentary stated, "I sold Berserk once I was done with it but keep Claymore in my collection."

  2. Mixed Feelings on Endings: Some participants shared thoughts on endings from other series, with one declaring, "The Attack on Titan, Gantz, and Promised Netherland endings werenโ€™t that bad at all."

  3. Criticism of Classic Works: Opinions vary widely about established series. A commenter noted, "I 100% agree with Junji Ito. His art is good, but the story is nothing special." This highlights ongoing frustrations with long-standing titles.

  • A notable commentary stated, "I sold Berserk once I was done with it but keep Claymore in my collection."

Community Sentiment

The blend of opinions ranges from disappointment to analytical observations, with many leaning towards critical reflections on long-beloved titles like Berserk. Several express a desire for more complex character development, questioning whether mainstream popularity equates to quality.

"Iโ€™ve only read Uzumaki, but the characters were so underdeveloped I really couldnโ€™t care at all about what was happening to them," shared one frustrated reader.

Participants also explored genre preferences, with someone mentioning that isekai was better as a shojo trope and praising eBooks for their practicality. This hints at a broader discussion around modern consumption of manga.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Both Junji Itoโ€™s and Berserk's writing quality under scrutiny; many feel let down.

  • ๐Ÿ” Diverse opinions call into question what makes a series 'great'.

  • ๐ŸŽจ Art is praised, yet storytelling is deemed lacking by several contributors.

  • ๐Ÿ“– Many readers find value in alternative endings, sparking renewed discussions.

This conversation illuminates a critical connection between art and narrative, challenging fans to reevaluate their favorites amidst a wave of dissent.