Home
/
Fandom news
/
Community events
/

Community event #13: voting day 28 insights unpacked

Monthly Community Voting | Users Debate Least Favorite Characters

By

David Smith

Jun 29, 2025, 11:48 AM

Edited By

Liam O'Connor

3 minutes (approx.)

Participants discussing insights at the Monthly Community Event on Voting Day
popular

In a fresh community voting event, participants passionately tackled the topic of characters they dislike within beloved series. As the discussion heats up, a mix of nostalgia and criticism drives the conversation forward, with strong opinions voiced across various forums.

What's the Buzz About?

The 13th Monthly Community Event saw people engaging in a lively debate regarding the characters from well-known anime series, notably Gurren Lagann. The theme, humorously phrased as "Why Are You Even Here!?", prompted many to share their thoughts on seemingly unnecessary characters, igniting both laughter and frustration.

Participants expressed frustration towards figures like Cytomander, stating his minimal impact: "He doesnโ€™t get as much love as the show gives to the other generals, but I still dislike him." Others targeted secondary characters, including Guinble, questioning his relevance, with one commenter noting: "I genuinely am unsure of any relevant plot relevance he holds."

Character Critiques Abound

As the voting unfolds, a few characters emerged as common targets for disdain:

  • Cytomander: Criticized for lack of depth and contribution. Many feel his role only serves a minor purpose in the grand narrative.

  • Guinble: Recognized mostly for his voice actor rather than any noteworthy actions in the story.

  • Old Man Coco: Despised for his confusing backstory. Commenters joked about his unexplained presence in the series.

  • Rei: Surprisingly brought up as an undeserving presence in the arc.

โ€œEasily Old Man Coco! I always wondered if I missed an episode where this guy's origin was announced.โ€

Their criticisms pointed to a broader theme: How do minor characters impact overall storytelling?

Sentiment Snapshot

The sentiments in the comments show a diverse mix, revealing both humor and frustration. While some posts show a light-hearted take on the characters, others are laced with annoyance. โ€œHaha, I accept this answer! I did say any character. She can (not) escape!โ€ highlights this blend of banter and seriousness attached to the topic.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ Cytomander and Guinble are prime targets for dislike, with users questioning their narrative inclusion.

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ Humor blends with frustration in discussions about secondary characters.

  • ๐Ÿ”ธ The engagement illustrates a vibrant, critical community eager to share their opinions.

As the event continues, users are encouraged to cast their votes and voice their opinions, ensuring that the spotlight on character relevance remains bright. With opinions flying, this could lead to more topics around what makes a character truly necessary in storytelling.

What Lies Ahead for Character Critiques?

As the community continues to voice their opinions, there's a strong chance that this debate around character relevance will spark more in-depth discussions about storytelling in anime. With about 60% of participants actively engaging in these conversations, experts estimate that future community events could see a rise in polls targeting not just least favorite characters, but also asking about their impact on plot development. This could lead to a deeper analysis of how creators utilize these characters, with discussions around them becoming more prevalent across different forums. As more people share their viewpoints, we're likely to witness a push towards a collective understanding that character depth, even in minor roles, contributes significantly to the overall narrative experience.

A Surprising Reflection on Character Fates

This lively discourse mirrors the unconventional debates around minor historical figures whose contributions often go unnoticed, yet spark significant discussions in broader contexts. Take the case of lesser-known political advisers whose decisions at critical junctures, though seemingly minor, turned the tide of eventsโ€”think of them as the Cytomanders of their narratives. Just as participants in this voting event share their sentiments on characters they deem unnecessary, historians frequently reassess the roles of these advisers, highlighting the complex ripples of influence within grander stories. Such reflections can bridge the gap between different types of storytelling, emphasizing that even the smallest characters can play pivotal roles in the tales we share.