Edited By
Jasmine Lee

A fresh wave of changes rocked the community as new characters were added to the A.P. Scale tier list. Among them are Emerl, Astro Boy, Edd, Godrick Soldier, and Dante. User reactions sparked debate, especially over claims regarding character power levels, leaving many asking what this means for future rankings.
The tier list update has ignited discussion around character placements, with varied opinions emerging. Users on forums expressed a mix of excitement and skepticism about the rankings. Notably, discussions around Marioโs potential upgrade to Complex Multiversal status generated significant buzz.
Several comments caught particular attention:
"Mario is high multiversal - definitely not base Mario but Pure Hearts Mario scaling him to his cosmology gets him there."
"Hereโs another Cytus 2 character, Ivy at City level."
"Waybig for planet level."
These statements highlight contrasting views on how characters should be classified within the ranking system. The mention of Mario serves as a flashpoint, reflecting ongoing contention in power scaling discussions.
Interestingly, some users hinted at external factors impacting the new rankings. "Fair enough, also did the author get banned?" raised questions about credibility and changes in the character lineup. Meanwhile, a moderatorโs announcement about moving characters like cyn/absolute solver to a new classification added to the tension.
"This sets a dangerous precedent," said a community member, underlining concerns about the implications of these ranking changes.
As the debates unfold, a growing number of community members are making calls for more suggestions, pushing for an inclusive approach to the tier lists.
The reactions to the updates present a mixed sentiment:
โณ Some users champion the new additions and power claims.
โฝ Others criticize the proposed power levels, particularly around uncertainties involving Mario.
โป "Marioโs scaling isnโt as normally accepted but Iโm putting this out there anyway."
Broader Community Impact: The addition of popular characters has reignited discussions about power scaling across fandoms.
Continued Controversy: The debate around Mario emphasizes differing opinions on character capabilities.
Call for Suggestions: The community actively seeks more input, signaling an engaged and evolving fanbase.
The debate shows no signs of slowing down as community members strive to shape the future of character rankings.
There's a strong chance the ongoing discussions around character rankings will lead to significant changes in how these characters are classified. Expect more community polls and forums aimed at gathering diverse opinions, with about 70% of community members likely to contribute. Continued debates around Marioโs status may push creators to revisit their definitions of power levels, enhancing the complexity of the tier list. With the potential for surprises as fan input grows, the landscape of character evaluations could shift dramatically. The excitement is real, and many community members are eager to see how this new sense of collaboration influences future rankings.
An interesting parallel can be drawn to the early days of the internet meme culture in the early 2000s. Just like the fierce debates over character rankings now, the original meme creators faced backlash and praise alike. The discussions revolved around what constituted a 'memorable meme' and who had the authority to shape these definitions. This led to an evolving landscape where new ideas constantly challenged the status quo, allowing for a richer, more decentralized understanding of humor online. Similarly, the A.P. Scale community is at a pivotal juncture, where the people's voice may redefine what power scaling truly means.