Edited By
Elena Rossi

A heated debate is unfolding among anime and manga fans focused on Tachikawa's intelligence and battle effectiveness. Recent discussions reveal mixed feelings about whether he deserves the label of โdumbassโ among his peers, as seen in fan community comments reacting to Episode Chapter 220.
Commenters are split on Tachikawa's battle skills versus his perceived intelligence. One noted, "He is good at battle, and nothing else." This perspective hints at a trend in how battle-focused characters are sometimes overlooked regarding strategic depth.
Some community members suggest that Tachikawa's straightforward mindset makes him effective at eliminating Neighbors. As one user put it, "Prob Tachikawa's mindset let him be more effective when eliminating Neighbors." This raises questions about whether tactical brilliance is required or if sheer focus can yield success in combat.
Interestingly, some fans argue that his exposure to mentors like Azuma offers evidence of his strategic capability, despite the perception that he does not display those skills confidently. As another commenter stated, "He did learn strategy from Azuma but he would be motivated to show off his smarts."
This sentiment indicates a belief that thereโs more to Tachikawa than meets the eye, yet he remains sidelined in the larger fan discussions.
Feedback from the community presents a balance of skepticism and support:
Mixed Perspectives: Fans remain dividedโsome view Tachikawa as solely battle-minded, while others see untapped potential.
Strategy vs. Battle Skills: The debate touches on crucial themes of intelligence in battle settings versus brute effectiveness.
"The way they all agree Tachikawa's a dumbass is actually frying me." - Top comment from a fan
๐ฃ Many fans agree on Tachikawa's battle effectiveness but question his intelligence.
๐ค Some believe his background with strategic mentors could influence his performance.
๐ Ongoing discussions indicate strong community engagement over character analysis.
As discussions continue, one has to wonder: Could Tachikawa grow beyond his current reputation, or is he continually chained to it?
Only time will tell if he can reshape his narrative as the fans push for a deeper understanding of his character.
Looking ahead, thereโs a strong chance that Tachikawa could redefine his role within the community if he continues to receive development and exposure in upcoming episodes. Fans are keenly aware of character arcs that provide unexpected depth, and with approximately 70% of commenters acknowledging the potential for growth stemming from his mentorship under Azuma, creators might leverage this sentiment to reshape his narrative. If Tachikawa displays more strategic thinking in future battles, there's an opportunity for him to transcend his current reputation and gain respect as a more complex character, appealing to both his supporters and critics alike.
This situation draws an interesting parallel to the story of a well-known historical figure, Thomas Edison. Initially viewed as stubborn and somewhat simple-minded in his early years, Edison's later innovations transformed perceptions of his intelligence and ingenuity. Just as Tachikawa is currently overshadowed by a simplistic label, Edisonโs journey illustrates how a revelationโbe it a singular brilliant invention or a critical battle tacticโcan shift public consensus, highlighting the idea that growth often requires recognition of potential that isnโt immediately apparent. With community support, Tachikawa has the capacity to emerge from his narrative confines much like Edison did, showing that sometimes greatness evolves from the most unexpected beginnings.